Question:
I blocked Bill Block field(VBAK-FAKSK)using object V_VBAK_ATT/05,43 in
in transaction VA02 and its working very well except when we choose
Orders which are under document type CR=Credit Memo request OR DR=Debit Memo request.These are "ADJUSTMENT type orders".This time Bill Block field is not greyed out and user can go and change this field and can save data.I dont know if this is a kind of Bug or we need any settings at table level.Please help.
Thanks
Answer:
Hi,
The problem could be that the acess to this action is not controlled by this authorization object which u r refering to, try to run a trace as n when you are performing the activity and collect the info about the auth objs being called then make changes in that accordingly.
I think running trace through ST01 will i think give u necessary info to solve the problem.
Try this out and let me know,
Cheers,
Guest__1
Answer:
Hi,
The problem could be that the acess to this action is not controlled by this authorization object which u r refering to, try to run a trace as n when you are performing the activity and collect the info about the auth objs being called then make changes in that accordingly.
I think running trace through ST01 will i think give u necessary info to solve the problem.
Try this out and let me know,
Cheers,
Guest__1
Thanks for your reply but I did trace.Thats the first thing I did.The trace gives same auth objects, same value checked both the times(I mean when Order is with CR/DR or without)
Answer:
Hi,
then if u have seen the trace for auth checks, see if u have given authorisation for the similar obj. in diff transaction codes(va35 va45...etc) which are also called in the background, see if they have default auth from su24 for these values which you mentioned previously. The point is that you should not have the authorisation for this obj across the whole buffer.
Verify this and let me know.
Views from others is also welcome.
Cheers,
guest__1
Answer:
[quote="Guest_98"] I blocked Bill Block field(VBAK-FAKSK)using object V_VBAK_ATT/05,43 in transaction VA02
***********************************************************
Do you know why V_VBAK_ATT does not exist in my SAP system ?
Answer:
[quote="SAPSEC"] I blocked Bill Block field(VBAK-FAKSK)using object V_VBAK_ATT/05,43 in transaction VA02
***********************************************************
Do you know why V_VBAK_ATT does not exist in my SAP system ?
Please check again.Is is not there for VA02 or the object itself not exist?
Thanks
Answer:
Hi,
then if u have seen the trace for auth checks, see if u have given authorisation for the similar obj. in diff transaction codes(va35 va45...etc) which are also called in the background, see if they have default auth from su24 for these values which you mentioned previously. The point is that you should not have the authorisation for this obj across the whole buffer.
Verify this and let me know.
Views from others is also welcome.
Cheers,
guest__1
I have ONLY VA02 in the role.So possibilty of this object coming from any other roles or transaction is none.Please let me know this is what you are asking me or I misunderstood your question.
Thanks
Answer:
Hi,
I would like to clarify you that the objects which are in check and maintain will only appear in PFCG authorisations tab, that doesnot mean that the object is not there, so do the following and let me know,
1. From the trace file see the Tcodes which are called
2. Then see in su24 if for these Tcodes the object is existing as check or not and what are its default values,
If this object exists as only check object then its bringing those authurisations with it, that might be the cause of the problem you are facing,
what are the field values for this obj.
By the way is the object name v_vbak_aat or v_vbak_att, i am not having this object i.e. ending in att, let me know
Rgrds,
Answer:
[quote="Anonymous"][quote="SAPSEC"] I blocked Bill Block field(VBAK-FAKSK)using object V_VBAK_ATT/05,43 in transaction VA02
***********************************************************
Do you know why V_VBAK_ATT does not exist in my SAP system ?
Please check again.Is is not there for VA02 or the object itself not exist?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I tried to insert object V_VBAK_ATT into a role having t-code VA02 and
system gave mesaage : no such object.
Answer:
Hi,
then if u have seen the trace for auth checks, see if u have given authorisation for the similar obj. in diff transaction codes(va35 va45...etc) which are also called in the background, see if they have default auth from su24 for these values which you mentioned previously. The point is that you should not have the authorisation for this obj across the whole buffer.
Verify this and let me know.
Views from others is also welcome.
Cheers,
guest__1
Hi,
I did check other transaction vA05, 25, 45, 55.Though this object is checked for them but not the values in SU24.
Problem is for one order, it worked very well and for other order which is Adjustment type(CR=credit or DR=Debit), it wont work.
Answer:
Hi,
I would like to clarify you that the objects which are in check and maintain will only appear in PFCG authorisations tab, that doesnot mean that the object is not there, so do the following and let me know,
1. From the trace file see the Tcodes which are called
2. Then see in su24 if for these Tcodes the object is existing as check or not and what are its default values,
If this object exists as only check object then its bringing those authurisations with it, that might be the cause of the problem you are facing,
what are the field values for this obj.
By the way is the object name v_vbak_aat or v_vbak_att, i am not having this object i.e. ending in att, let me know
Rgrds,
Thanks...As I said in my earlier reply, I did check all the transaction called in my trace in SU24.Though this object V_VBAK_AAT is check/maintain or check, there is NO default values.Values are not present or not maintain.So that is NOT the cause.I think its something releted with Order as it works for one order and not for other.
Sorry the object is V_VBAK_AAT.
Answer:
[quote="Anonymous"]Hi,
then if u have seen the trace for auth checks, see if u have given authorisation for the similar obj. in diff transaction codes(va35 va45...etc) which are also called in the background, see if they have default auth from su24 for these values which you mentioned previously. The point is that you should not have the authorisation for this obj across the whole buffer.
Verify this and let me know.
Views from others is also welcome.
Cheers,
guest__1
Hi Guest__1,
Did you find out any more on this? Any one else any comment on this?
Thanks