Question:
Hi,
I want to set the requested date at header level to one derived via a set of rules that I will code. If the segment E2EDK03 is not sent should I change the delivery date in a "normal" exit in SAPMV45A or is there an enhancement exit which I can use as part of the inbound idoc processing ?
Any help gratefully received.
_________________
Avast there ye landlubbers
Captain Haddock is back !
Answer:
Use user Exit i.e. called after each segment is read.
Don't use the user exits in appplication programs for EDI purpose.
Your requirement was not clear i.e which message you are using etc.
Answer:
I am using ORDERS05. I am not aware what user exits are available to intervene in the idoc processing. The segment which would hold the requested delivery date at header level I will not be receiving in the inbound order file. It will not be sent as the date is based on delivery policy and data from the SAP customer.
A pointer toward the exits in question would be gratefully received.
_________________
Avast there ye landlubbers
Captain Haddock is back !
Answer:
set your rules up your map , e,g, received date +5 and write this into the field when creating the IDOC
Answer:
Use user Exit i.e. called after each segment is read.
Don't use the user exits in appplication programs for EDI purpose.
Your requirement was not clear i.e which message you are using etc.
The one piece of information I am still missing is the name(s) of the user exits I can use when inbound idocs are being created.
_________________
Avast there ye landlubbers
Captain Haddock is back !
Answer:
If you use the idoc rules technique:
Create a variable rule with BD62, BD79, BD55.
then use user exits EXIT_SAPFKCIM_001, and 002.
remember to take sender_set and give back receiver_set_new in your exits.
Answer:
Hi Captain,
How are you going to handle the requested delivery date if the sales order is created using transaction VA01 or BAPI or BDC etc. I prefer using user exits in SAPMV45A. However if you still want to do it for ORDERS05, refer to the components of the enhancement 'VEDA0001'.
Thanks,
Manoj Pingali